Legal
AI Disclosure
Last updated: August 13, 2026
The short version
We use artificial intelligence as a drafting and research aid for the educational material on this website. We do not use it to give legal advice, and we do not put client information into it. Every article published here is reviewed by an attorney before it goes live and is published under the name of the attorney who takes responsibility for it.
Website and educational content
Much of the explanatory material on this site, including articles and blog posts about asset protection, is drafted with the assistance of AI tools and then edited and reviewed by our attorneys and staff. The topics, positions, and legal substance are ours. The tool helps with structure and first drafts; it does not decide what the firm thinks.
Before anything is published, an attorney reviews it for legal accuracy. Articles carry a byline identifying the attorney responsible for the content, along with bar admission details you can verify independently, and a date showing when the material was last updated.
We think disclosure is the right approach here. Readers deserve to know how the material they are reading was produced, and a firm that is willing to say so is easier to trust than one that is not.
Legal work is different
Client representation is performed by licensed attorneys. We do not delegate legal judgment to an AI system. Trust structures, engagement strategy, and the advice we give about a client’s specific circumstances are the work of lawyers who are accountable for them, subject to professional duties, and answerable to the bars that license them.
Nothing on this website is legal advice, whether or not AI assisted in drafting it, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. See our disclaimer for the full explanation.
Client information and confidentiality
We do not enter client confidential information, privileged communications, or personally identifying client details into public AI tools. Our duty of confidentiality does not change because a technology is convenient, and the protections that matter most to our clients are the ones we are least willing to compromise.
Accuracy and correction
AI tools can produce confident and incorrect statements. That is precisely why attorney review sits between drafting and publication, and why we cite primary sources such as statutes, court opinions, and IRS guidance so you can check our work rather than take it on faith.
If you find something on this site that is inaccurate or out of date, we would genuinely like to know. Tell us at Info@BlakeHarrisLaw.com and we will review it.
Changes to this policy
AI tools, and the rules that govern their use in the practice of law, are changing quickly. We expect to update this page as they do, and the date at the top reflects the most recent revision.
Questions
If you have questions about how we use these tools, reach us at Info@BlakeHarrisLaw.com, (786) 692-6397, or through our contact page.