AI Disclosure

We use artificial intelligence as a drafting and research aid for the educational material on this website. We do not use it to give legal advice, and we limit any client information it sees to what a task requires. Everything published here is reviewed by the firm before it goes live, and our articles are published under the name of the attorney responsible for them.

Much of the explanatory material on this site, including articles and blog posts about asset protection, is drafted with the assistance of AI tools and then edited and reviewed by our attorneys and staff. The topics, positions, and legal substance are ours. The tool helps with structure and first drafts; it does not decide what the firm thinks.

Before anything is published, it is reviewed by the firm. Articles carry a byline identifying the attorney responsible for the content, along with bar admission details you can verify independently, and a date showing when the material was last updated. Where an attorney has reviewed a blog post for legal accuracy, its byline also names the reviewer.

We think disclosure is the right approach here. Readers deserve to know how the material they are reading was produced, and a firm that is willing to say so is easier to trust than one that is not.

Client representation is performed by licensed attorneys. We do not delegate legal judgment to an AI system. Trust structures, engagement strategy, and the advice we give about a client’s specific circumstances are the work of lawyers who are accountable for them, subject to professional duties, and answerable to the bars that license them.

Nothing on this website is legal advice, whether or not AI assisted in drafting it, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. See our disclaimer for the full explanation.

Our duty of confidentiality applies to every tool we use. When we use AI tools in our work, including with our own business records, we limit the client and prospective-client information involved to what the task requires. AI tools do not make decisions about a client’s matter; our attorneys do.

AI tools can produce confident and incorrect statements. That is why review sits between drafting and publication, and why we cite primary sources such as statutes, court opinions, and IRS guidance so you can check our work rather than take it on faith.

If you find something on this site that is inaccurate or out of date, we would genuinely like to know. Tell us at Info@BlakeHarrisLaw.com and we will review it.

AI tools, and the rules that govern their use in the practice of law, are changing quickly. We expect to update this page as they do, and the date at the top reflects the most recent revision.

If you have questions about how we use these tools, reach us at Info@BlakeHarrisLaw.com, (786) 692-6397, or through our contact page.