New York Asset Protection

New York gives residents some protection against creditors, but those protections are relatively limited, and the state does not allow someone to place their own assets into a self-settled trust and keep them protected from creditors. For people with significant wealth outside the state's exemptions, that can make an offshore asset protection trust worth considering.

The tradeoff is that offshore planning has to be done before a specific creditor problem develops. It also comes with meaningful setup and annual costs, federal reporting requirements, and a transfer of legal ownership to an independent trustee.

New York does protect part of a primary residence, certain personal property, and a portion of wages. Those protections are generally narrower than what residents may have in states such as Florida or Texas. This page explains what New York law protects, where the gaps remain, and when an offshore trust may make sense.

What New York Law Already Protects, and What It Doesn't

New York protects some property from judgment creditors, but its exemptions are generally narrower than those available in states such as Florida and Texas.

New York does not allow married couples to hold ordinary bank or investment accounts as tenants by the entirety. That form of ownership is generally limited to real estate and certain cooperative interests. Even then, a creditor of one spouse may be able to reach that spouse's interest while the other spouse keeps their own rights in the property.

Does New York Allow an Asset Protection Trust?

No. New York does not authorize a domestic self-settled asset protection trust (DAPT), and its statute is unusually direct about trusts created for the settlor's own benefit.

EPTL §7-3.1(a) provides: "A disposition in trust for the use of the creator is void as against the existing or subsequent creditors of the creator." A New York resident therefore cannot transfer assets to a trust, remain the person for whose use the trust was created, and rely on the trust to prevent personal creditors from reaching those assets.

That rule is different from New York's treatment of a trust created by someone else for a beneficiary. Under EPTL §7-1.5, the beneficiary's right to receive income from an express trust generally cannot be transferred unless the trust instrument gives the beneficiary that power — the mechanism a spendthrift trust relies on. Those protections can apply because the beneficiary is not trying to protect assets that he or she placed into a trust for personal use.

The distinction substantially narrows the domestic options for New Yorkers protecting their own wealth. Creating a self-settled trust under another state's law does not erase the potential conflict with New York's express statutory rule — a choice-of-law clause does not settle the question by itself. For a New York resident with significant non-exempt assets, that exposure is one reason the asset protection discussion may move offshore rather than depend on another state's domestic asset protection trust statute.

What New York Residents Actually Use

New York residents generally begin with the exemptions and liability-separating structures available under state law, but those protections leave more exposed wealth than the corresponding rules in Florida or Texas.

The homestead exemption protects only a specified amount of equity rather than an unlimited value. Even in New York City and the other counties receiving the highest exemption, the current amount is $204,825. Equity above the applicable exemption can remain available to creditors.

New York also protects certain personal property, but many exemptions have relatively modest dollar limits. Wages can be subject to an income execution, although CPLR §5231 limits how much can be withheld and protects earnings below specified thresholds.

Married couples have some protection through tenancy by the entirety, but it applies to real property and qualifying cooperative apartments rather than ordinary financial accounts. An individual creditor can also reach the debtor spouse's interest subject to the other spouse's rights.

LLCs and other business entities can separate liabilities associated with investment property or business operations from assets held elsewhere, but they do not exempt an owner's personal assets from a personal judgment.

Where an Offshore Trust Fits

An offshore asset protection trust can address substantial non-exempt wealth that New York's exemptions, insurance, and domestic entities do not cover. It does so by placing legal ownership of trust assets with an independent trustee in a foreign jurisdiction rather than relying on another U.S. state's self-settled trust statute — which, given EPTL §7-3.1, is a particularly uncertain route for a New York resident.

Blake Harris Law works with offshore structures in the Cook Islands, Nevis, and Belize, with the Cook Islands serving as the firm's primary jurisdiction for asset protection trusts.

The structure is not appropriate for everyone. The economics generally make sense for individuals with roughly $500,000 or more in personal assets at meaningful creditor risk; below that level, the setup and annual costs may outweigh the benefit.

Timing is equally important. If a known creditor claim already exists, an offshore trust should not be used to move assets beyond that creditor's reach.

What Is the Major Disadvantage of an Asset Protection Trust?

A major disadvantage of an offshore asset protection trust is the loss of direct legal ownership that comes with an irrevocable structure, along with substantial setup, maintenance, and reporting costs.

An independent trustee holds legal title to the trust assets. The settlor can remain a beneficiary and retain certain rights, but someone who wants unrestricted personal control over every asset may not be comfortable with the arrangement.

We charge $25,000 to establish a standard Cook Islands Trust and $7,000 annually for trustee administration, ongoing legal counsel, and the Protector.

Foreign trusts also create federal reporting obligations. Depending on the structure and accounts, required filings can include Forms 3520 and 3520-A, FBAR, and Form 8938. CPA preparation typically adds approximately $2,000 to $3,000 per year. The trust does not reduce U.S. income taxes; a standard U.S.-settlor structure remains taxable to the settlor.

Timing creates another limitation. Funding a trust after a claim develops can lead to fraudulent-transfer challenges, court orders, and potential contempt exposure for violating those orders. Anyone seeking to hide assets from an existing creditor, avoid taxes, or retain unrestricted direct ownership should not use an offshore asset protection trust.

Cost and Timeline

The full cost breakdown sets out what each figure covers.

Timing: Why This Only Works Before a Claim

Asset protection works best when it is done before a specific creditor problem exists. Once a lawsuit, demand, or other claim has developed, transferring assets into a trust can raise fraudulent-transfer concerns instead of creating legitimate protection for future risks.

New York, like most states, looks at the circumstances surrounding the transfer. A court may consider whether the person had already been sued or threatened with suit, continued using or controlling the property, concealed the transfer, moved most of their assets, or made the transfer around the time substantial debt was incurred. Those factors come from the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act framework as adopted state by state, and New York's version appears in the Debtor and Creditor Law.

A shorter limitations period under foreign law does not make an improper transfer valid or override U.S. law that still applies. We decline engagements structured to defeat a known creditor. If a claim has already developed, we look instead at the lawful options that are still available — and the four rules that decide how courts treat these structures are the place to start.

How Blake Harris Law Works with New York Residents

We focus exclusively on offshore asset protection and work with structures in the Cook Islands, Nevis, and Belize. Blake Harris is admitted to practice in Florida and Colorado, and the firm works with New York residents on offshore planning governed by foreign trust law and U.S. federal reporting rules.

For new Cook Islands Trust engagements, Blake Harris Law recommends Atlas Trust Company, a licensed Cook Islands trustee co-founded by Blake Harris. That relationship is disclosed, and clients may select another licensed Cook Islands trustee.

We also review existing exemptions, non-exempt assets, potential exposure, timing, and cost before recommending an offshore structure. If New York law already provides sufficient protection, the assets at risk do not justify the expense, or the proposed planning is directed at a known creditor, we will say that an offshore trust is not appropriate.

Next step

Considering a Cook Islands Trust?

A confidential consultation. One business day response. No obligation, no paperwork until you're ready.

Schedule a consultation (786) 692-6397